@article{oai:soar-ir.repo.nii.ac.jp:00017260,
 author = {藤澤,  誠},
 issue = {1},
 journal = {信州大學紀要},
 month = {Jul},
 note = {Yao Chi Heng lived a studious life in the period of the Ching dynasty 清朝 and contributed not a little to substantiate Chinese philosoply as a learned member of the school of Classic-Reference; though, while he lived, he made little conspicuous movement among his contemporaries. He entertained some consistent doubts upon, and so refuted, the truth of the traditional belief in the "Chung-yung" 中庸 being the direct issue of Confucianism, which was wholly recognized by Cheng , Chu, Wang 程・朱・王 and so forth through the age of Sung and Ming 宋・明 Yao Chi Heng, on the contrary set up a new and original view quite opposite to those of his predecessors with regard to ethical and philosophical-thoughts contained in the "Chung-yung". The exposition of his view makes up his "Wei Chung-yung Shuo". So he, not only gave a solid foundation for his refutation, but also has furnished an indispensable material to show the general trend of study and learning in the transition period of the earlier part of the Cling dynasty. One of the most interesting results of his researches bring us to the' view that the "Chung-yung" contains in it the idea of both Laotzeism and Buddhism 老仏思想. He examined the relation of the one to the other from the evolutional point of view, stage after stage in the development of ethical and philosophical thoughts. This deserves our attention as a characteristic of his original attitude, because no other instance of the similar case has ever been seen since that time. The present thesis is intended to show what his observation on the "Chung-yung" was and to make some criticism on it at the same time. The author deems it most important that his research of the interrelation of Laotzeic ,and Buddhistic ideas the more heightened the value the "Chung-yung", by his epoch-making statements no less than it gave an inevitablestimulus to the rise and development of the new school of Confucianism centering in the study, of the "Chung-Yung" as the reverse effect of his revolutional statement., Article, 信州大學紀要 1(1): 1-14(1951)},
 pages = {1--14},
 title = {清の姚際恆の偽中庸説について},
 volume = {1},
 year = {1951}
}