Item type |
会議発表論文 / Conference Paper(1) |
公開日 |
2010-11-22 |
タイトル |
|
|
言語 |
en |
|
タイトル |
Livelihood Pattern and Forest Dependence of the Major Tribes in Rangamati, Bangladesh |
言語 |
|
|
言語 |
eng |
キーワード |
|
|
主題 |
Forest dependence |
キーワード |
|
|
主題 |
Livelihood |
キーワード |
|
|
主題 |
Tribal people |
キーワード |
|
|
主題 |
Bangladesh |
資源タイプ |
|
|
資源 |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794 |
|
タイプ |
conference paper |
その他(別言語等)のタイトル |
|
|
その他のタイトル |
バングラデシュ・ランガティ地域主要民族の生活パターンと森林への依存 |
著者 |
MUHAMMED, Nur
OESTEN, Gerhard
von, DETTEN, Roderich
MASUM, Md. Farhad Hossain
CHAKMA, Sheeladitya
|
出版者 |
|
|
出版者 |
信州大学国際シンポジウム2010実行委員会 |
引用 |
|
|
内容記述タイプ |
Other |
|
内容記述 |
Shinshu University International Symposium 2010 : Sustainable Agriculture and Environment : Asian Networks II 信州大学国際シンポジウム2010 : 持続的農業と環境 : アジアネットワークII ― アジアネットワークの発展をめざして―. 信州大学農学部, 2010, 45-58 |
書誌情報 |
Shinshu University International Symposium 2010 : Sustainable Agriculture and Environment : Asian Networks II 信州大学国際シンポジウム2010 : 持続的農業と環境 : アジアネットワークII ― アジアネットワークの発展をめざして―
p. 45-58,
発行日 2010-02-20
|
抄録 |
|
|
内容記述タイプ |
Abstract |
|
内容記述 |
Indigenous people are of great interest and intense significance from forest perspective, as they inhabit for a very long time over the same region. In Bangladesh, tribal communities reside with close touch of forests and thus, quite dependent on it. That’s why, it of tremendous importance to study their Do’s and Don’ts in order to propose better forest and environmental management interventions considering options for enhancing livelihoods of the indigenous communities in Bangladesh. In this research, four major tribes of Rangamati in four sites have been purposively selected for questionnaire survey. Data has been taken into consideration from two vital viewpoint, livelihood pattern and forest dependence, assuming that all tribes are dependent on forest resources for their livelihood. And it is found that, Tanchangya and Chakma community are more economically well-off in terms of land ownership and income per capita respectively. Forestry practice provides little share in their total income though Tanchangya community has the highest land per capita in forestry sector as well as in agricultural sector. On the other hand, Marma community’s living standard is comparatively low as their income and land per capita is low, and they are more dependent on forest. Tripura community keeps the comparative middle status in almost every sector. A variety of other social and environmental factors were also collected and thoroughly analyzed here which can be very useful for further study. |
資源タイプ(コンテンツの種類) |
|
|
内容記述タイプ |
Other |
|
内容記述 |
Other |
出版タイプ |
|
|
出版タイプ |
VoR |
|
出版タイプResource |
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 |