ログイン
言語:

WEKO3

  • トップ
  • コミュニティ
  • ランキング
AND
To
lat lon distance
To

Field does not validate



インデックスリンク

インデックスツリー

メールアドレスを入力してください。

WEKO

One fine body…

WEKO

One fine body…

アイテム

{"_buckets": {"deposit": "5730587b-8288-4d7a-9302-b83584d10158"}, "_deposit": {"id": "16022", "owners": [], "pid": {"revision_id": 0, "type": "depid", "value": "16022"}, "status": "published"}, "_oai": {"id": "oai:soar-ir.repo.nii.ac.jp:00016022"}, "item_10_biblio_info_6": {"attribute_name": "\u66f8\u8a8c\u60c5\u5831", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"bibliographicIssueDates": {"bibliographicIssueDate": "2008-04-02", "bibliographicIssueDateType": "Issued"}, "bibliographicPageEnd": "206", "bibliographicPageStart": "193", "bibliographicVolumeNumber": "2", "bibliographic_titles": [{"bibliographic_title": "\u4fe1\u5dde\u5927\u5b66\u4eba\u6587\u793e\u4f1a\u79d1\u5b66\u7814\u7a76"}]}]}, "item_10_description_20": {"attribute_name": "\u6284\u9332", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_description": "By May 2009, the participation of the general public in the justice system will be implemented in Japan. In this paper, I examine what legal interpretation and game theoretical analysis have to say about the saiban-in( lay judges) selection system. Specifically, the issues that I discuss are as follows: 1) The meaning and outline of the saiban-in trial system: We find that this system is built not for the democratization of the justice but for the Japanese government. The opinion polls show that most Japanese people do not want it. 2) The lack of need for the panel being balanced; we do not have to care to set up the panel to reflect the state of Japanese society. 3) The possibility of the peremptory challenges to the saiban-in candidates; the panel can be manipulated by the defense and the prosecutor. 4) The desired practice of the saiban-in selection by the legal theoretical approach; the prosecutor as the guardian of the public interests and the defense as the fighter for justice will use the rights of challenge of the unfair candidates. 5) The prospective practice of saiban-in selection by the game theoretical approach: the prosecutor and the defense as the rational players will exercise the rights of the challenge to the disadvantageous candidates to themselves. 6) The possibility of change in the saiban-in\u0027s preferences by the deliberation in court; the rational players must take account of the plasticity of their preferences. 7) The important consideration for the rational players; which is more important in the saiban-in selection before the trial or the trial procedures in the court? It depends on how the meaning of the deliberation is evaluated.", "subitem_description_type": "Abstract"}]}, "item_10_description_30": {"attribute_name": "\u8cc7\u6e90\u30bf\u30a4\u30d7\uff08\u30b3\u30f3\u30c6\u30f3\u30c4\u306e\u7a2e\u985e\uff09", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_description": "Article", "subitem_description_type": "Other"}]}, "item_10_description_31": {"attribute_name": "\u30d5\u30a9\u30fc\u30de\u30c3\u30c8\uff1amime\u30bf\u30a4\u30d7", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_description": "application/pdf", "subitem_description_type": "Other"}]}, "item_10_description_5": {"attribute_name": "\u5f15\u7528", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_description": "\u4fe1\u5dde\u5927\u5b66\u4eba\u6587\u793e\u4f1a\u79d1\u5b66\u7814\u7a76 2: 193-206(2008)", "subitem_description_type": "Other"}]}, "item_10_publisher_4": {"attribute_name": "\u51fa\u7248\u8005", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_publisher": "\u4fe1\u5dde\u5927\u5b66\u4eba\u6587\u793e\u4f1a\u79d1\u5b66\u7814\u7a76\u4f1a"}]}, "item_10_select_64": {"attribute_name": "\u8457\u8005\u7248\u30d5\u30e9\u30b0", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_select_item": "publisher"}]}, "item_10_source_id_35": {"attribute_name": "ISSN", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_source_identifier": "1881-7858", "subitem_source_identifier_type": "ISSN"}]}, "item_10_source_id_39": {"attribute_name": "NII ISSN", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_source_identifier": "1881-7858", "subitem_source_identifier_type": "ISSN"}]}, "item_10_source_id_40": {"attribute_name": "\u66f8\u8a8c\u30ec\u30b3\u30fc\u30c9ID", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_source_identifier": "AA12207624", "subitem_source_identifier_type": "NCID"}]}, "item_10_text_66": {"attribute_name": "sortkey", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_text_value": "15"}]}, "item_creator": {"attribute_name": "\u8457\u8005", "attribute_type": "creator", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"creatorNames": [{"creatorName": "YANASE,  Noboru"}], "nameIdentifiers": [{"nameIdentifier": "46194", "nameIdentifierScheme": "WEKO"}]}]}, "item_files": {"attribute_name": "\u30d5\u30a1\u30a4\u30eb\u60c5\u5831", "attribute_type": "file", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"accessrole": "open_date", "date": [{"dateType": "Available", "dateValue": "2015-09-28"}], "displaytype": "detail", "download_preview_message": "", "file_order": 0, "filename": "Humanities\u0026Social02-15.pdf", "filesize": [{"value": "773.1 kB"}], "format": "application/pdf", "future_date_message": "", "is_thumbnail": false, "licensetype": "license_free", "mimetype": "application/pdf", "size": 773100.0, "url": {"label": "Humanities\u0026Social02-15.pdf", "url": "https://soar-ir.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/16022/files/Humanities\u0026Social02-15.pdf"}, "version_id": "528220cf-0681-4691-8470-ad72541e8ca1"}]}, "item_keyword": {"attribute_name": "\u30ad\u30fc\u30ef\u30fc\u30c9", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_subject": "optimal saiban-in (lay judges) selection", "subitem_subject_scheme": "Other"}, {"subitem_subject": "meaning of the deliberation", "subitem_subject_scheme": "Other"}, {"subitem_subject": "judicial reform in Japan", "subitem_subject_scheme": "Other"}]}, "item_language": {"attribute_name": "\u8a00\u8a9e", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_language": "eng"}]}, "item_resource_type": {"attribute_name": "\u8cc7\u6e90\u30bf\u30a4\u30d7", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"resourcetype": "departmental bulletin paper", "resourceuri": "http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501"}]}, "item_title": "The Meaning and Outline of the Saiban-in (Lay Judges) Selection System in Japan: Legal Interpretation and Game Theoretical Analysis", "item_titles": {"attribute_name": "\u30bf\u30a4\u30c8\u30eb", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_title": "The Meaning and Outline of the Saiban-in (Lay Judges) Selection System in Japan: Legal Interpretation and Game Theoretical Analysis"}]}, "item_type_id": "10", "owner": "1", "path": ["1544/1546/1548/1556"], "permalink_uri": "http://hdl.handle.net/10091/1797", "pubdate": {"attribute_name": "\u516c\u958b\u65e5", "attribute_value": "2009-02-24"}, "publish_date": "2009-02-24", "publish_status": "0", "recid": "16022", "relation": {}, "relation_version_is_last": true, "title": ["The Meaning and Outline of the Saiban-in (Lay Judges) Selection System in Japan: Legal Interpretation and Game Theoretical Analysis"], "weko_shared_id": null}
  1. 100 全学教育機構
  2. 1002 紀要
  3. 10021 信州大学人文社会科学研究
  4. Vol. 02

The Meaning and Outline of the Saiban-in (Lay Judges) Selection System in Japan: Legal Interpretation and Game Theoretical Analysis

http://hdl.handle.net/10091/1797
c0e29578-9ca2-4e60-b0ec-9f7882f73762
名前 / ファイル ライセンス アクション
Humanities&Social02-15.pdf Humanities&Social02-15.pdf (773.1 kB)
Item type 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1)
公開日 2009-02-24
タイトル
タイトル The Meaning and Outline of the Saiban-in (Lay Judges) Selection System in Japan: Legal Interpretation and Game Theoretical Analysis
言語
言語 eng
キーワード
主題Scheme Other
主題 optimal saiban-in (lay judges) selection
キーワード
主題Scheme Other
主題 meaning of the deliberation
キーワード
主題Scheme Other
主題 judicial reform in Japan
資源タイプ
資源 http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
タイプ departmental bulletin paper
著者 YANASE, Noboru

× YANASE, Noboru

WEKO 46194

YANASE, Noboru

Search repository
出版者
出版者 信州大学人文社会科学研究会
引用
内容記述タイプ Other
内容記述 信州大学人文社会科学研究 2: 193-206(2008)
書誌情報 信州大学人文社会科学研究

巻 2, p. 193-206, 発行日 2008-04-02
抄録
内容記述タイプ Abstract
内容記述 By May 2009, the participation of the general public in the justice system will be implemented in Japan. In this paper, I examine what legal interpretation and game theoretical analysis have to say about the saiban-in( lay judges) selection system. Specifically, the issues that I discuss are as follows: 1) The meaning and outline of the saiban-in trial system: We find that this system is built not for the democratization of the justice but for the Japanese government. The opinion polls show that most Japanese people do not want it. 2) The lack of need for the panel being balanced; we do not have to care to set up the panel to reflect the state of Japanese society. 3) The possibility of the peremptory challenges to the saiban-in candidates; the panel can be manipulated by the defense and the prosecutor. 4) The desired practice of the saiban-in selection by the legal theoretical approach; the prosecutor as the guardian of the public interests and the defense as the fighter for justice will use the rights of challenge of the unfair candidates. 5) The prospective practice of saiban-in selection by the game theoretical approach: the prosecutor and the defense as the rational players will exercise the rights of the challenge to the disadvantageous candidates to themselves. 6) The possibility of change in the saiban-in's preferences by the deliberation in court; the rational players must take account of the plasticity of their preferences. 7) The important consideration for the rational players; which is more important in the saiban-in selection before the trial or the trial procedures in the court? It depends on how the meaning of the deliberation is evaluated.
資源タイプ(コンテンツの種類)
内容記述タイプ Other
内容記述 Article
ISSN
収録物識別子タイプ ISSN
収録物識別子 1881-7858
書誌レコードID
収録物識別子タイプ NCID
収録物識別子 AA12207624
戻る
0
views
See details
Views

Versions

Ver.1 2021-03-01 10:08:10.816167
Show All versions

Share

Mendeley CiteULike Twitter Facebook Print Addthis

Cite as

Export

OAI-PMH
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR
  • OAI-PMH DublinCore
  • OAI-PMH DDI
Other Formats
  • JSON
  • BIBTEX

Confirm


Powered by CERN Data Centre & Invenio


Powered by CERN Data Centre & Invenio