ログイン
言語:

WEKO3

  • トップ
  • ランキング
To
lat lon distance
To

Field does not validate



インデックスリンク

インデックスツリー

メールアドレスを入力してください。

WEKO

One fine body…

WEKO

One fine body…

アイテム

{"_buckets": {"deposit": "f1644cd6-d82b-4676-971c-5d994c28436e"}, "_deposit": {"id": "17718", "owners": [], "pid": {"revision_id": 0, "type": "depid", "value": "17718"}, "status": "published"}, "_oai": {"id": "oai:soar-ir.repo.nii.ac.jp:00017718", "sets": []}, "author_link": ["49613"], "item_10_biblio_info_6": {"attribute_name": "書誌情報", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"bibliographicIssueDates": {"bibliographicIssueDate": "1972-03-15", "bibliographicIssueDateType": "Issued"}, "bibliographicPageEnd": "103", "bibliographicPageStart": "93", "bibliographicVolumeNumber": "6", "bibliographic_titles": [{"bibliographic_title": "信州大学教養部紀要. 第一部, 人文科学"}]}]}, "item_10_description_20": {"attribute_name": "抄録", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_description": "In the field of linguistics in Japan, more attention should be paid to the London School of Linguistics, particularly its contextual theory, which was initiated by Bronislaw Malinowski and developed by J. R. Firth. Malinowski applied the conception of the context of situation in his anthropological analysis, while Firth used it for the formulation of linguistic theory. Malinowski\u0027s context of situation, which is in more concrete form than Firth\u0027s, implies not only the verbal context of the utterance, but also the matrix of non-linguistic relevant features including even the \u0027context of culture.\u0027 Firth\u0027s idea of context is more abstract. His proposed interior relations of context are as follows: 1. The participants: persons, personalities and relevant features of these. (a) The verbal action of the participants. (b) The non-verbal action of the participants. 2. The relevant objects and non-verbal and non-personal events. This proposal has some points which could be improved. Firstly, the participants (addresser or addressee) should not be included in context. Secondly, personalities as explained in Firth (1957), should not be taken into account at some levels of linguistic analysis, at least in grammar. From Firth\u0027s point of view, linguistics at all levels of analysis is. concerned with \u0027meaning\u0027, or function in context, which is the center of his analysis both of linguistic form and of linguistic function. Any meaningful linguistic analysis would be impossible without taking into account the context, in addition to other fundamental factors of languageaddresser, addressee, message and form. The language-event should be held to consist of the functions of all these factors. The transformational grammarians\u0027 criticism that because context or situation could not be described exhaustively, it should not be described at all, comes from their misunderstanding of the terms. Context is an abstraction from (human) experience and is not the same as realities. The British linguists\u0027 countercriticism is that competence-dominated linguistics, which takes a de-situationalized view of language, is not fruitful. Context should be classified on the basis of some linguistic formal criteria, as shown in this paper. Moreover, something like context must also underlie the concept of transformation. This will become more probable if we consider that Noam Chomsky\u0027s transformational gramimar was originated from Z. S. Harris\u0027s discourse analysis and that transformationalists have been recently concerned with problems of semantics, presupposition and discourse. One of the most important areas of both present-day and traditional linguistics has been the treatment of linguistic units larger than sentences. Therefore, transformational grammar and the London School of Linguistics should and could be complementary to each other. The adequancy of the contextual theory is clarified in its application in the linguistic analysis of English fragmentary sentences on the basis of data obtained from James Joyce\u0027s Dubliners. The tentative classification of fragmentary sentences in Dubliners is shown with relevant examples.", "subitem_description_type": "Abstract"}]}, "item_10_description_30": {"attribute_name": "資源タイプ(コンテンツの種類)", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_description": "Article", "subitem_description_type": "Other"}]}, "item_10_description_31": {"attribute_name": "フォーマット:mimeタイプ", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_description": "application/pdf", "subitem_description_type": "Other"}]}, "item_10_description_5": {"attribute_name": "引用", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_description": "信州大学教養部紀要. 第一部, 人文科学 6: 93-103(1972)", "subitem_description_type": "Other"}]}, "item_10_publisher_4": {"attribute_name": "出版者", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_publisher": "信州大学教養部"}]}, "item_10_select_64": {"attribute_name": "著者版フラグ", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_select_item": "publisher"}]}, "item_10_source_id_35": {"attribute_name": "ISSN", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_source_identifier": "0583-0605", "subitem_source_identifier_type": "ISSN"}]}, "item_10_source_id_39": {"attribute_name": "NII ISSN", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_source_identifier": "0583-0605", "subitem_source_identifier_type": "ISSN"}]}, "item_10_source_id_40": {"attribute_name": "書誌レコードID", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_source_identifier": "AN00121159", "subitem_source_identifier_type": "NCID"}]}, "item_10_text_66": {"attribute_name": "sortkey", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_text_value": "06"}]}, "item_1627890569677": {"attribute_name": "出版タイプ", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_version_resource": "http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85", "subitem_version_type": "VoR"}]}, "item_creator": {"attribute_name": "著者", "attribute_type": "creator", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"creatorNames": [{"creatorName": "宮井,  捷二"}], "nameIdentifiers": [{"nameIdentifier": "49613", "nameIdentifierScheme": "WEKO"}]}]}, "item_files": {"attribute_name": "ファイル情報", "attribute_type": "file", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"accessrole": "open_date", "date": [{"dateType": "Available", "dateValue": "2015-09-28"}], "displaytype": "detail", "download_preview_message": "", "file_order": 0, "filename": "Liberal_arts_H06-06.pdf", "filesize": [{"value": "523.7 kB"}], "format": "application/pdf", "future_date_message": "", "is_thumbnail": false, "licensetype": "license_note", "mimetype": "application/pdf", "size": 523700.00000000006, "url": {"label": "Liberal_arts_H06-06.pdf", "url": "https://soar-ir.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/17718/files/Liberal_arts_H06-06.pdf"}, "version_id": "ca9345b0-ee77-4333-916a-910bfbe59032"}]}, "item_language": {"attribute_name": "言語", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_language": "jpn"}]}, "item_resource_type": {"attribute_name": "資源タイプ", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"resourcetype": "departmental bulletin paper", "resourceuri": "http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501"}]}, "item_title": "ロンドン学派言語学の脈絡理論について", "item_titles": {"attribute_name": "タイトル", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_title": "ロンドン学派言語学の脈絡理論について", "subitem_title_language": "ja"}, {"subitem_title": "Some Notes on the Contextual Theory Developed by the London School of Linguistics", "subitem_title_language": "en"}]}, "item_type_id": "10", "owner": "1", "path": ["1737"], "permalink_uri": "http://hdl.handle.net/10091/4246", "pubdate": {"attribute_name": "PubDate", "attribute_value": "2010-02-12"}, "publish_date": "2010-02-12", "publish_status": "0", "recid": "17718", "relation": {}, "relation_version_is_last": true, "title": ["ロンドン学派言語学の脈絡理論について"], "weko_shared_id": -1}
  1. 911 (旧)教養部
  2. 9111 信州大学教養部紀要 第一部, 人文科学
  3. Vol. 06

ロンドン学派言語学の脈絡理論について

http://hdl.handle.net/10091/4246
http://hdl.handle.net/10091/4246
c0b2d110-0fef-4251-abfa-24305f634ba2
名前 / ファイル ライセンス アクション
Liberal_arts_H06-06.pdf Liberal_arts_H06-06.pdf (523.7 kB)
Item type 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1)
公開日 2010-02-12
タイトル
言語 ja
タイトル ロンドン学派言語学の脈絡理論について
タイトル
言語 en
タイトル Some Notes on the Contextual Theory Developed by the London School of Linguistics
言語
言語 jpn
資源タイプ
資源 http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
タイプ departmental bulletin paper
著者 宮井, 捷二

× 宮井, 捷二

WEKO 49613

宮井, 捷二

Search repository
出版者
出版者 信州大学教養部
引用
内容記述タイプ Other
内容記述 信州大学教養部紀要. 第一部, 人文科学 6: 93-103(1972)
書誌情報 信州大学教養部紀要. 第一部, 人文科学

巻 6, p. 93-103, 発行日 1972-03-15
抄録
内容記述タイプ Abstract
内容記述 In the field of linguistics in Japan, more attention should be paid to the London School of Linguistics, particularly its contextual theory, which was initiated by Bronislaw Malinowski and developed by J. R. Firth. Malinowski applied the conception of the context of situation in his anthropological analysis, while Firth used it for the formulation of linguistic theory. Malinowski's context of situation, which is in more concrete form than Firth's, implies not only the verbal context of the utterance, but also the matrix of non-linguistic relevant features including even the 'context of culture.' Firth's idea of context is more abstract. His proposed interior relations of context are as follows: 1. The participants: persons, personalities and relevant features of these. (a) The verbal action of the participants. (b) The non-verbal action of the participants. 2. The relevant objects and non-verbal and non-personal events. This proposal has some points which could be improved. Firstly, the participants (addresser or addressee) should not be included in context. Secondly, personalities as explained in Firth (1957), should not be taken into account at some levels of linguistic analysis, at least in grammar. From Firth's point of view, linguistics at all levels of analysis is. concerned with 'meaning', or function in context, which is the center of his analysis both of linguistic form and of linguistic function. Any meaningful linguistic analysis would be impossible without taking into account the context, in addition to other fundamental factors of languageaddresser, addressee, message and form. The language-event should be held to consist of the functions of all these factors. The transformational grammarians' criticism that because context or situation could not be described exhaustively, it should not be described at all, comes from their misunderstanding of the terms. Context is an abstraction from (human) experience and is not the same as realities. The British linguists' countercriticism is that competence-dominated linguistics, which takes a de-situationalized view of language, is not fruitful. Context should be classified on the basis of some linguistic formal criteria, as shown in this paper. Moreover, something like context must also underlie the concept of transformation. This will become more probable if we consider that Noam Chomsky's transformational gramimar was originated from Z. S. Harris's discourse analysis and that transformationalists have been recently concerned with problems of semantics, presupposition and discourse. One of the most important areas of both present-day and traditional linguistics has been the treatment of linguistic units larger than sentences. Therefore, transformational grammar and the London School of Linguistics should and could be complementary to each other. The adequancy of the contextual theory is clarified in its application in the linguistic analysis of English fragmentary sentences on the basis of data obtained from James Joyce's Dubliners. The tentative classification of fragmentary sentences in Dubliners is shown with relevant examples.
資源タイプ(コンテンツの種類)
内容記述タイプ Other
内容記述 Article
ISSN
収録物識別子タイプ ISSN
収録物識別子 0583-0605
書誌レコードID
収録物識別子タイプ NCID
収録物識別子 AN00121159
出版タイプ
出版タイプ VoR
出版タイプResource http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
戻る
0
views
See details
Views

Versions

Ver.1 2021-03-01 09:33:48.872287
Show All versions

Share

Mendeley Twitter Facebook Print Addthis

Cite as

エクスポート

OAI-PMH
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR
  • OAI-PMH DublinCore
  • OAI-PMH DDI
Other Formats
  • JSON
  • BIBTEX

Confirm


Powered by WEKO3


Powered by WEKO3